4.6 Article

Magnetic porous organic polymers for extraction of cardiovascular drugs in human urine samples followed by HPLC-UV

Journal

ANALYTICAL METHODS
Volume 12, Issue 2, Pages 141-148

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ay02041a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21575108, 21575107, 21775113]
  2. Science Fund for Creative Research Groups of the NSFC [20921062]
  3. Large-scale Instrument and Equipment Sharing Foundation of Wuhan University [LF20181063]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Herein, magnetic porous organic polymers (MOPs) prepared via an azo coupling reaction in water under mild conditions are evaluated for the extraction of seven cardiovascular drugs, including xylocaine, metoprolol, mexiletine, labetalol, propranolol, carvedilol and propafenone, from human urine samples for the first time. The extraction mechanisms are assumed to be electrostatic interaction and pi-pi stacking. The MOPs exhibited fast adsorption/desorption time (13 min) and high enrichment factors (315-365-fold) for target analytes. Based on this, a method coupling magnetic solid phase extraction with HPLC-UV detection was developed for the analysis of cardiovascular drugs. Under the optimized conditions, the LODs (S/N = 3) were in the range of 0.06-0.57 mu g L-1 with an RSD (n = 5) of 4.3-8.6%, and the linear range was 0.2-200 mu g L-1 for propranolol, 2-200 mu g L-1 for metoprolol, and 0.5-200 mu g L-1 for the other five analytes. The developed method was applied for the analysis of cardiovascular drugs in urine samples with recoveries of 89.0-112%. In order to further evaluate the application potential of this method, real-time monitoring of metoprolol in urine samples collected from volunteers treated with metoprolol tablets was performed. The proposed method is simple, fast, and sensitive and has good potential in the monitoring of cardiovascular drugs in competitive sports and clinical analysis.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available