4.6 Article

Reversible and irreversible colossal barocaloric effects in plastic crystals

Journal

JOURNAL OF MATERIALS CHEMISTRY A
Volume 8, Issue 2, Pages 639-647

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9ta10947a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. MINECO [MAT2016-75823-R, FIS2017-82625-P]
  2. DGU [2017SGR-42]
  3. UK EPSRC [EP/M003752/1]
  4. ERC [680032]
  5. Royal Society
  6. European Research Council (ERC) [680032] Funding Source: European Research Council (ERC)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The extremely large latent heat exchanged in phase transitions involving strong molecular orientational disordering has recently led to the proposal of plastic crystals as a feasible solution for solid-state barocaloric eco-friendly cooling technologies. Here we determine the reversible barocaloric response of four plastic crystals derived from neopentane [C(CH3)(4)]: (NH2)C(CH2OH)(3) (TRIS for short), (NH2)(CH3)C(CH2OH)(2) (AMP), (CH3)C(CH2OH)(3) (PG) and (CH3)(3)C(CH2OH) (NPA). All of them display colossal entropy changes at their ordered-plastic phase transition, which is a primal requirement for competitive barocaloric materials. However, we show that it is also important to verify that the large barocaloric effects can be achieved using pressures that, while being moderate, are large enough to overcome the pressure-dependent hysteresis. From this quantity and using the quasi-direct method, we determine the minimum pressure needed to achieve reversible barocaloric effects, p(rev), for each compound. Specifically, we find a small and moderate p(rev) for PG and NPA, respectively, which therefore display colossal reversible barocaloric effects comparable to harmful fluids used in current refrigerators and thus confirm the potential of plastic crystals as excellent alternatives. Instead, in TRIS and AMP, the obtained p(rev) is excessive to yield reversible barocaloric effects useful for cyclic applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available