4.7 Article

Shear Measurement Bias Due to Spatially Varying Spectral Energy Distributions in Galaxies

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 888, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab54cb

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique
  2. Office of Science of the U.S. Department of Energy [DE-AC02-05CH11231]
  3. UK BIS National E-infrastructure capital grants
  4. GridPP Collaboration
  5. DOE [DE-AC02-76SF00515, DE-SC0019351]
  6. NSF (Stanford) [PHY-1404070]
  7. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019351] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Galaxy color gradients (CGs)-i.e., spectral energy distributions that vary across the galaxy profile-will impact galaxy shape measurements when the modeled point-spread function (PSF) corresponds to that for a galaxy with spatially uniform color. This paper describes the techniques and results of a study of the expected impact of galaxy CGs on weak lensing measurements with the Large Synoptic Survey Telescope (LSST) when the PSF size depends on wavelength. The bias on cosmic shear measurements from CGs is computed both for parametric bulge+disk galaxy simulations and for more realistic chromatic galaxy surface brightness profiles based on Hubble Space Telescope V- and I-band images in the All-Wavelength Extended Groth Strip International Survey (AEGIS). For the parametric galaxies, and for the more realistic galaxies derived from AEGIS galaxies with a sufficient signal-to-noise ratio that CG bias can be isolated, the predicted multiplicative shear biases due to CGs are found to be at least a factor of two below the LSST full-depth requirement on the total systematic uncertainty in the redshift-dependent shear calibration. The analysis code and data products are publicly available (https://github.com/sowmyakth/measure_cg_bias).

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available