3.8 Article

Stable SiO2-TiO2 composite-based nanofluid of improved rheological behaviour for high-temperature oilfield applications

Journal

GEOSYSTEM ENGINEERING
Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 51-61

Publisher

TAYLOR & FRANCIS LTD
DOI: 10.1080/12269328.2020.1713909

Keywords

Nanoparticles; nanofluid; polymer; rheology; stability; temperature

Funding

  1. Science and Engineering Research Board, Department of Science and Technology [SB/S3/CE/057/2015]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Nanofluid synthesis in pure water is associated with premature settlement resulting in least dispersion stability. Therefore, in this study, polyacrylamide (PAM) is used as viscosity enhancer to improve dispersion stability of nanofluid stabilized by composites of silica and titania. Different techniques such as dynamic light scattering measurements, electrical conductivity, scanning electron microscopy, and rheological studies are used to support the analysis. The use of silica and titania nanoparticles together with PAM has additional advantage over particle agglomeration, and thus, the dispersion stability improved. Further, nanofluid stabilized by composites of silica and titania was tested for rheological measurements at 90 degrees C to find nanotechnology applicability in high-temperature applications. The shear-thinning behaviour of nanofluids at high temperature (90 degrees C) was least affected by shear deformation and reduced to 0.48 mPa.s at higher shear rate (4200 s(-1)), while shear thinning of PAM solution seriously varied with increasing shear deformation and takes the edge of 0.0005 mPa.s at higher shear rate (4200 s(-1)). In addition, the thermal stability of nanofluids was better due to slight decrease in viscosity with increasing temperature, which makes them suitable to be utilized at high-temperature applications in widespread industrial areas including oilfield where the temperature becomes a major factor.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available