4.7 Article

Efficient Production of S8 in Interstellar Ices: The Effects of Cosmic-Ray-driven Radiation Chemistry and Nondiffusive Bulk Reactions

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 888, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab5360

Keywords

Cosmic rays; Astrochemistry; Interstellar molecules; Dense interstellar clouds; Interstellar dust processes

Funding

  1. Alexander von Humboldt Foundation
  2. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO) via a VENI fellowship [722.017.008]
  3. National Science Foundation [AST 1906489]
  4. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00351]
  5. Russian Science Foundation [18-12-00351] Funding Source: Russian Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we reexamine sulfur chemistry occurring on and in the ice mantles of interstellar dust grains, and report the effects of two new modifications to standard astrochemical models: namely, (a) the incorporation of cosmic-ray-driven radiation chemistry and (b) the assumption of fast, nondiffusive reactions for key radicals in the bulk. Results from our models of dense molecular clouds show that these changes can have a profound influence on the abundances of sulfur-bearing species in ice mantles, including a reduction in the abundance of solid-phase H2S and HS, and a significant increase in the abundances of OCS, SO2, as well as pure allotropes of sulfur, especially S-8. These pure-sulfur species-though nearly impossible to observe directly-have long been speculated to be potential sulfur reservoirs and our results represent possibly the most accurate estimates yet of their abundances in the dense interstellar medium. Moreover, the results of these updated models are found to be in good agreement with available observational data. Finally, we examine the implications of our findings with regard to the as-yet-unknown sulfur reservoir thought to exist in dense interstellar environments.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available