3.8 Article

Analysis of barriers in implementation of digital transformation of supply chain using interpretive structural modelling approach

Journal

JOURNAL OF MODELLING IN MANAGEMENT
Volume 15, Issue 1, Pages 297-317

Publisher

EMERALD GROUP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.1108/JM2-03-2019-0066

Keywords

Innovation; Modelling; Supply chain management; Digital supply chain (DSC); Barriers; Interpretive structural modelling (ISM); Digital skills

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose Digital supply chain (DSC) is an agile, customer-driven and productive way to develop different forms of returns for companies and to leverage efficient approaches with emerging techniques and data analytics. Though the advantages of digital supply chain management (DSCM) are many, its implementation is quite slow for several reasons. The purpose of this paper is to identify the major barriers which hinder the adoption of DSC and to analyse the interrelationship among them. The barriers of DSC are explored on the basis of existing literature and experts' opinion. Design/methodology/approach This paper uses the interpretive structural modelling (ISM) approach to develop a hierarchical structural model which shows the mutual dependence among the barriers of DSC. Cross-impact matrix multiplication applied to classification analysis was performed to represent these barriers graphically on the basis of their driving power and dependence. Findings The research demonstrates that the barriers no sense of urgency, lack of industry specific guidelines, lack of digital skills and talent and high implementation and running cost are the most significant barriers to digital transformation of supply chain. This paper also suggests some managerial implications to overcome the barriers which hinder the implementation of digital transformation of supply chain. Originality/value This is one of the initial research studies which has analysed the barriers of DSC using ISM approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available