4.7 Article

Ultrahigh-energy Cosmic-Ray Interactions as the Origin of Very High-energy γ-Rays from BL Lacertae Objects

Journal

ASTROPHYSICAL JOURNAL
Volume 889, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

IOP PUBLISHING LTD
DOI: 10.3847/1538-4357/ab6131

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Research Foundation (South Africa) [111749]
  2. University of Johannesburg Research Council

Ask authors/readers for more resources

We explain the observed multiwavelength photon spectrum of a number of BL Lacertae (BL Lac) objects detected at very high energy (VHE, E greater than or similar to 30 GeV), using a lepto-hadronic emission model. The one-zone leptonic emission is employed to fit the synchrotron peak. Subsequently, the SSC spectrum is calculated, such that it extends up to the highest energy possible for the jet parameters considered. The data points beyond this energy, and also in the entire VHE range are well explained using a hadronic emission model. The ultrahigh-energy cosmic rays (UHECRs, E greater than or similar to 0.1 EeV) escaping from the source interact with the extragalactic background light (EBL) during propagation over cosmological distances to initiate electromagnetic cascade down to similar to 1 GeV energies. The resulting photon spectrum peaks at similar to 1 TeV energies. We consider a random turbulent extragalactic magnetic field (EGMF) with a Kolmogorov power spectrum to find the survival rate of UHECRs within 0 degrees.1 of the direction of propagation in which the observer is situated. We restrict ourselves to an rms value of EGMF, B-rms similar to 10(-5) nG, for a significant contribution to the photon spectral energy distribution from UHECR interactions. We found that UHECR interactions on the EBL and secondary cascade emission can fit gamma-ray data from the BL Lac objects we considered at the highest energies. The required luminosity in UHECRs and corresponding jet power are below the Eddington luminosities of the supermassive black holes in these BL Lac objects.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available