3.8 Article

Distinguishing Complex PTSD from Borderline Personality Disorder among individuals with a history of sexual trauma: A latent class analysis

Journal

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.ejtd.2018.08.004

Keywords

Post-traumatic stress; Complex posttraumatic stress; ICD-11; Borderline personality disorder; Sexual assault

Funding

  1. European Commission's Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, under the Marie Sklodowska-Curie grant [722523]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Introduction. - There has been debate regarding whether Complex PTSD (CPTSD) is conceptually distinct from Borderline Personality Disorder (BPD). Objective. - To assess whether ICD-11 CPTSD was distinguishable from BPD in a sample of sexual assault survivors. Method. - A subsample of individuals (n = 956), that selected sexual assault as an index trauma, were selected from a U.S. general population survey dataset. The distribution of PTSD, CPTSD and BPD symptomology was evaluated using latent class analysis (LCA). Multinomial logistic regression analyses were performed to evaluate whether various forms of child maltreatment and cumulative child maltreatment could discriminate between classes. Results. - CPTSD emerged as a distinct symptom profile within the sample. Conversely, BPD symptomology was evident in two classes but was accompanied by PTSD/CPTSD symptomology in each. Overall, five classes were identified that differed both quantitatively and qualitatively. Cumulative childhood maltreatment and physical neglect predicted CPTSD class membership. Conclusion. - The findings suggest that CPTSD is distinct from BPD among a sample of individuals who have been shown to be at significant risk for both diagnoses. Further research is required to identify factors that distinguish CPTSD from BPD. Crown Copyright (C) 2018 Published by Elsevier Masson SAS. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available