4.6 Article

Do different probing depths exhibit striking differences in microbial profiles?

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 45, Issue 1, Pages 26-37

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12811

Keywords

16S rDNA; bacteria; dental plaque; high-throughput nucleotide sequencing; periodontal disease

Funding

  1. Sao Paulo Research Foundation [2012/20915-0, 2013/23767-5, 2013/12107-4]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

AimTo perform a thorough characterization of the subgingival microbiota of shallow, moderate and deep sites in subjects with chronic periodontitis (ChP). Material and methodsSubgingival samples were collected from subjects with ChP (n=3/category of probing depth: 3, 4-6 and 7mm) and periodontal health (PH). Individual samples were submitted to 16S rDNA high- throughput sequencing and the analysis was made using mothur and R packages. ResultsNine subjects with ChP and seven with PH were included and 101 samples were evaluated. Thirteen phyla, 118 genera and 211 OTUs were detected. Taxa from Chloroflexi and Spirochaetes phyla were associated with initial stages of disease. Fretibacterium, Eubacterium[XI][G-6], Desulfobulbus, Peptostreptococcaceae[XI][G-1] and [G-3], Bacteroidetes[G-3], Bacteroidaceae[G-1] genera and Filifactor alocis, Fretibacterium fastidiosum, Johnsonella spHOT166, Peptostreptococcaceae[XIII][G-1]HOT113, Porphyromonas endodontalis and Treponema sp. HOT258, which are not conventionally associated with disease, increased with the deepening of the pockets and/or were elevated in ChP; while Streptococcus, Corynebacterium and Bergeyella genera were associated with PH (p<.05). ConclusionStriking differences were observed between the microbiota of shallow and moderate/deep sites, but not between moderate and deep sites in ChP subjects. Differences between shallow sites in PH and ChP were also observed. The characterized microbiota included known oral microorganisms and newly identified periodontal taxa, some of them not-yet-cultured.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available