4.6 Article

Efficacy of collagen matrix seal and collagen sponge on ridge preservation in combination with bone allograft: A randomized controlled clinical trial

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PERIODONTOLOGY
Volume 44, Issue 6, Pages 649-659

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpe.12722

Keywords

alveolar ridge preservation; bone allograft; collagen matrix; collagen sponge; extracellular matrix; extraction socket

Funding

  1. Department of Periodontology
  2. Division of Oral and Maxillofacial Radiology
  3. Advance Graduate Education Committee
  4. Implant Committee of Tufts University School of Dental Medicine

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim: To test whether the use of collagen matrix seal (CMS) results in similar hard and soft tissue remodelling to that with collagen sponge (CS) used as barriers 4 months following alveolar ridge preservation (ARP), in combination with freeze-dried bone allograft (FDBA). Materials and methods: Twenty-eight patients were randomly assigned to the two groups. Clinical and radiographic measurements were recorded with the same stent at baseline and 4 months for standardization. The flapless technique following a traumatic extraction was used for the two types of barriers. Results: All patients completed the study, 14 in the CMS group and 14 in the CS group. Reduction in coronal ridge width (1.21 mm-14.91% CMS and 1.47 mm-20.40% CS) and vertical buccal bone resorption (0.30 mm CMS and 0.79 mm CS) were not significantly different. A slight increase in buccal gingival thickness at the coronal part was observed in both groups (0.9 mm CMS and 0.5 mm CS). Conclusions: Collagen matrix seal and CS, when combined with FDBA, significantly minimized ridge resorption in all dimensions and maintained buccal soft tissue thickness in sockets with a buccal plate loss of <2 mm in comparison to previously reported findings recorded after tooth extraction without ARP.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available