4.7 Article

Association Between Treatment Facility Volume and Mortality of Patients With Multiple Myeloma

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ONCOLOGY
Volume 35, Issue 6, Pages 598-+

Publisher

LIPPINCOTT WILLIAMS & WILKINS
DOI: 10.1200/JCO.2016.68.3805

Keywords

-

Categories

Funding

  1. Eagles Cancer Research Fund Pilot Grant
  2. Mayo Clinic Division of Hematology
  3. Mayo Clinic Robert D. and Patricia E. Kern Center for the Science of Health Care Delivery

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose To determine the association between the number of patients with multiple myeloma (MM) treated annually at a treatment facility (volume) and all-cause mortality (outcome). Methods Using the National Cancer Database, we identified patients diagnosed with MM between 2003 and 2011. We classified the facilities by quartiles (Q; mean patients with MM treated per year): Q1:,3.6; Q2: 3.6 to 6.1, Q3: 6.1 to 10.3, and Q4:. 10.3. We used random intercepts to account for clustering of patients within facilities and Cox regression to determine the volume- outcome relationship, adjusting for demographic (sex, age, race, ethnicity), socioeconomic (income, education, insurance type), geographic (area of residence, treatment facility location, travel distance), and comorbid (Charlson-Deyo score) factors and year of diagnosis. Results There were 94,722 patients with MM treated at 1,333 facilities. The median age at diagnosis was 67 years, and 54.7% were men. The median annual facility volume was 6.1 patients per year (range, 0.2 to 109.9). The distribution of patients according to facility volume was: Q1: 5.2%, Q2: 12.6%, Q3: 21.9%, and Q4: 60.3%. The unadjusted median overall survival by facility volume was: Q1: 26.9 months, Q2: 29.1 months, Q3: 31.9 months, and Q4: 49.1 months (P<.001). Multivariable analysis showed that facility volume was independently associated with all- cause mortality. Compared with patients treated at Q4 facilities, patients treated at lower-quartile facilities had a higher risk of death (Q3 hazard ratio [HR], 1.12 [95% CI, 1.08 to 1.16]; Q2 HR, 1.17 [95% CI, 1.12 to 1.21]; Q1 HR, 1.22 [95% CI, 1.17 to 1.28]). Conclusion Patients who were treated forMMat higher- volume facilities had a lower risk of mortality compared with those who were treated at lower- volume facilities. (C) 2016 by American Society of Clinical Oncology

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available