4.3 Article

Perceived acceptability of wearable devices for the treatment of mental health problems

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL PSYCHOLOGY
Volume 76, Issue 6, Pages 987-1003

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jclp.22934

Keywords

clinical decision-making; e-mental health; patient acceptance of healthcare; patient preferences; wearable electronic devices

Funding

  1. Australian Government Research Training Program (RTP) Scholarship
  2. CSIRO

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Objective This study examined the potential acceptability of wearable devices (e.g., smart headbands, wristbands, and watches) aimed at treating mental health disorders, relative to conventional approaches. Methods A questionnaire assessed perceptions of wearable and nonwearable treatments, along with demographic and psychological information. Respondents (N = 427) were adults from a community sample (M-age = 44.6, SDage = 15.3) which included current (30.2%) and former (53.9%) mental health help-seekers. Results Perceived effectiveness of wearables was a strong predictor of interest in using them as adjuncts to talk therapies, or as an alternative to self-help options (e.g., smartphone applications). Devices were more appealing to those with negative evaluations of psychological therapy and less experience in help-seeking. Conclusions Interest in using wearable devices was strong, particularly when devices were seen as effective. Clients with negative attitudes to conventional therapies may be more responsive to using wearable devices as a less directive treatment approach.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available