4.5 Article

Catalytic pyrolysis of pinewood over ZSM-5 and CaO for aromatic hydrocarbon: Analytical Py-GC/MS study

Journal

JOURNAL OF THE ENERGY INSTITUTE
Volume 93, Issue 1, Pages 425-435

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.joei.2019.01.014

Keywords

Pinewood; Aromatic hydrocarbon; Py-GC/MS; ZSM-5; CaO

Categories

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [51776127]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A higher amount of oxygenates is the main constraint for higher yield and quality of aromatics in catalytic pyrolysis while a study of hydrocarbon production with a balance of reactive species lies importance in the catalytic upgrading of pyrolytic vapor. Catalytic pyrolysis of pinewood sawdust over acidic (ZSM-5) and basic (CaO) catalyst was conducted by means of Py-GC/MS to evaluate the effect of biomass to catalyst loading ratio on aromatic hydrocarbon production. Catalytic pyrolysis with four different biomass to catalyst ratios (0.25:1, 0.5:1, 1:1, and 2:1) and non-catalytic pyrolysis were conducted. It has been obtained that ZSM-5 showed better catalytic activity in terms of a high fraction of aromatic hydrocarbon. The ZSM-5 catalyst showed a potential on the aromatization as the yield of aromatic hydrocarbon was increased with a higher amount of ZSM-5 catalyst and the highest yield of aromatics (42.19 wt %) was observed for biomass to catalyst ratio of 0.25:1. On the other hand, basic CaO catalyst was not selective to aromatic hydrocarbon from pinewood sawdust but explored high deacidification reaction in pyrolytic vapor compared to ZSM-5 catalyst, whereas non-catalytic pyrolysis resulted in acidic species (13.45 wt %) and phenolics (46.5 wt %). Based on the results, ZSM-5 catalyst can only be suggested for catalytic pyrolysis of pinewood sawdust for aromatic hydrocarbon production. (C) 2019 Energy Institute. Published by Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available