4.7 Article

Hyperbranched multiple polythioamides made from elemental sulfur for mercury adsorption

Journal

POLYMER CHEMISTRY
Volume 11, Issue 4, Pages 810-819

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9py01544b

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. West Light Foundation of The Chinese Academy of Sciences [2017-XBQNXZ-B-001]
  2. Young Elite Scientist Sponsorship Program by CAST [2017QNRC001]
  3. National Natural Science Foundation of China [21464015, 21472235]
  4. Xinjiang Tianshan Talents Program [2018xgytsyc2-3]
  5. One Thousand Talents-Xinjiang Program

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Different from traditional polyethylenimine (PEI) modified Hg(II) adsorbent materials, a novel hyperbranched polythioamide adsorbent (SPD) was prepared by using sulfur, PEI and 1,4-diethynylbenzene (DEB) as monomers. There are tens and thousands of tons of sulfur produced from oil refinery processes as a major by-product each year, and its utilization becomes a concern due to its limited consumption, environmental problems and safety. Herein, a SPD was fabricated through a one-pot, catalyst-free polymerization which even can be solvent-free via using sulfur to solidify the liquid PEI. A kinetic study showed that the adsorption of Hg(II) ions followed the pseudo-second-order model, indicating chemical adsorption between Hg(II) ions and SPD. The SPD had a maximum adsorption capacity of 1161.99 mg g(-1). FT-IR and XPS measurements indicated that the removal of Hg(II) by SPD was mainly controlled by the coordination interaction between Hg(II) ions and nitrogen groups (i.e., amine and imine groups), and also C=S bonds of SPD. By using elemental sulfur, PEI becomes the backbone of the polymer system by forming -C(=S)NH- and -C(=S)N< groups unlike the grafted part of traditional PEI modified materials. TG, DTG, and DSC measurements showed that the main degradations occurred at around 160 degrees C and 360 degrees C.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available