4.6 Review

Do universal school-based mental health promotion programmes improve the mental health and emotional wellbeing of young people? A literature review

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL NURSING
Volume 27, Issue 3-4, Pages e412-e426

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jocn.14078

Keywords

coping; emotional well-being; health promotion interventions; help-seeking; mental health; psycho-education; schools; social skills; young people

Categories

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aims and objectivesTo examine evidenceusing a range of outcomesfor theeffectiveness of school-based mental health and emotional well-being programmes. BackgroundIt is estimated that 20% of young people experience mental health difficulties every year. Schools have been identified as an appropriate setting for providing mental health and emotional well-being promotion prompting the need to determine whether current school-based programmes are effective in improving the mental health and emotional well-being of young people. MethodsA systematic search was conducted using the health and education databases, which identified 29 studies that measured the effectiveness of school-based universal interventions. Prisma guidelines were used during the literature review process. ResultsThematic analysis generated three key themes: (i) help seeking and coping; (ii) social and emotional well-being; and (iii) psycho-educational effectiveness. ConclusionIt is concluded that whilst these studies show promising results, there is a need for further robust evaluative studies to guide future practice. Relevance to clinical practiceAll available opportunities should be taken to provide mental health promotion interventions to young people in the school environment, with a requirement for educational professionals to be provided the necessary skills and knowledge to ensure that the school setting continues to be a beneficial environment for conducting mental health promotion.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available