4.7 Article

Impact of Contaminating DNA in Whole-Genome Amplification Kits Used for Metagenomic Shotgun Sequencing for Infection

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL MICROBIOLOGY
Volume 55, Issue 6, Pages 1789-1801

Publisher

AMER SOC MICROBIOLOGY
DOI: 10.1128/JCM.02402-16

Keywords

metagenomics; prosthetic joint infection; whole-genome amplification

Categories

Funding

  1. National Institutes of Health [R01AR056647]
  2. BioFire
  3. Check-Points
  4. Curetis
  5. 3M
  6. Merck
  7. Hutchison Biofilm Medical Solutions
  8. Accelerate Diagnostics
  9. Allergan
  10. The Medicines Company
  11. TIB
  12. Samsung
  13. ASM
  14. IDSA
  15. [R01CA179243]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Whole-genome amplification (WGA) is a useful tool for amplification of very small quantities of DNA for many uses, including metagenomic shotgun sequencing for infection diagnosis. Depending on the application, background DNA from WGA kits can be problematic. Three WGA kits were tested for their utility in a metagenomics approach to identify the pathogens in sonicate fluid comprised of biofilms and other materials dislodged from the surfaces of explanted prosthetic joints using sonication. The Illustra V2 Genomiphi, Illustra single cell Genomiphi, and Qiagen REPLI-g single cell kits were used to test identical sonicate fluid samples. Variations in the number of background reads, the genera identified in the background, and the number of reads from known pathogens known to be present in the samples were observed between kits. These results were then compared to those obtained with a library preparation without prior WGA using an NEBNext Ultra II paired-end kit, which requires a very small amount of input DNA. This approach also resulted in the presence of contaminant bacterial DNA and yielded fewer reads from the known pathogens. These findings highlight the impact that WGA kit selection can have on metagenomic analysis of low-biomass samples and the importance of the careful selection and consideration of the implications of using these tools.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available