4.7 Article

Bringing the sharing-sparing debate down to the ground-Lessons learnt for participatory scenario development

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104262

Keywords

Participatory scenarios; Case studies; Land management; Land sharing; Land sparing; Transdisciplinary

Funding

  1. 2013-2014 BiodivERsA/FACCE-JPI joint call for research proposals
  2. Austrian Science Fund (FWF) [I 2046-B25]
  3. German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (BMBF) [Forderkennzeichen 01LC1404]
  4. Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (NWO)
  5. Spanish Ministry of Economy, Industry and Competitiveness [PCIN-2014-080]
  6. Swiss National Science Foundation [40FA40_158391]
  7. Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF) [40FA40_158391] Funding Source: Swiss National Science Foundation (SNF)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The concepts of Land Sharing (LSH) and Land Sparing (ISP) shall help to manage trade-offs between land use and biodiversity conservation but applications in real world contexts are scarce. We review the literature on scenario and stakeholder processes and present a participatory approach to translate the LSH/LSP concept into practice. It is based on a scenario definition process harmonized across five case studies in Europe and resulted in semi-quantitative participative LSH and LSP scenarios. Harmonization eases comparability among case studies despite fundamentally different scenarios due to heterogeneous conditions across the regions. A key challenge was the right level of standardization for the scenario process to reach a common understanding across case study regions while acknowledging regional peculiarities. The resulting scenarios support for regional specific planning recommendations and can be input to quantitative ecosystem service and biodiversity models.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available