4.7 Article

A factor-income approach to estimating grassland protection subsidy payments to livestock herders in Inner Mongolia, China

Journal

LAND USE POLICY
Volume 91, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104352

Keywords

Inner Mongolia; Payment for ecosystem services; Livestock production; Government subsidy; Grassland policy

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [DEB-1313693, EAPSI-1514650]
  2. Inner Mongolia Key Project [2016YFC0500504]
  3. Australian Centre for International Agricultural Research [ADP/2012/107]
  4. Innovative Team for the Ministry of Education, China [IRT_17R59]
  5. CSU

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This paper contributes to the growing literature on land use policies designed to prevent livestock overgrazing. It offers a straightforward factor-income approach to calculating payments for ecosystem services (PES) to livestock producers who reduce or suspend grazing for the purpose of grassland restoration. Our approach requires only cross-sectional farm-level accounting data and is thus feasible where policies have either not yet been applied or specialized data is sparse, as is common in many developing regions. We apply and validate this approach with empirical analysis of sheep and goat herders in the Ulanqab prefecture in Inner Mongolia, China where herders currently receive payments in exchange for reduced grazing intensity on vulnerable land. However, observed stocking rates are still commonly higher than recommended. Our results suggest payments are currently insufficient to offset the financial loss incurred by herders who reduce their grazing intensity, a finding consistent with previous studies. Using an approach we refer to as the factor-income method, we estimate and validate new levels of recommended payments. This demonstrates how future payments could be tailored to meet the financial needs of individual herding communities using basic farm-level data.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available