4.6 Article

Superior electrochemical performance of a novel LiFePO4/C/CNTs composite for aqueous rechargeable lithium-ion batteries

Journal

PHYSICAL CHEMISTRY CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 22, Issue 4, Pages 1953-1962

Publisher

ROYAL SOC CHEMISTRY
DOI: 10.1039/c9cp06042a

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Funds of China [51302214]
  2. Shaanxi Province Natural Science Key Funds [2019JZ-49]
  3. Xi'an Science and Technology Plan Project [201805034YD12CG18(5)]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Olivine LiFePO4 covered flocculent carbon layers wrapped with carbon nanotubes (CNTs) prepared by sol-gel method and calcination is used as the cathode material for aqueous rechargeable lithium-ion batteries (ARLBs). The phase structures and morphologies of the composite material are characterized by X-ray diffraction (XRD), selected area electron diffraction (SAED), and transmission electron microscopy (TEM). The mechanism and method through which CNTs and flocculent carbon improve the electrochemical performance are investigated in an aqueous lithium-ion battery by setting up a comparative experiment. The ARLB system is assembled using a LiFePO4/C/CNTs cathode and a zinc anode in 1 mol L-1 ZnSO4 center dot 7H(2)O and saturated LiNO3 aqueous solution (pH = 6), which can deliver a capacity of 158 mA h g(-1) at a rate of 1C. Even at a rate of 50C, it still has a capacity of 110 mA h g(-1) after 250 cycles with fantastic capacity retention (95.7%). The lithium-ion diffusion coefficient increases by an order of magnitude due to the addition of CNTs together with flocculent carbon. Four LEDs are successfully powered by the ARLBs for more than one minute to demonstrate the practical application. The excellent rate capabilities and thrilling discharge capacity at a high rate indicate that this cathode material possesses excellent electrochemical performance, and this ARLB system exhibits excellent potential as a power source for environmental applications.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available