4.5 Article

Prognostic significance of long noncoding RNA Z38 as a candidate biomarker in breast cancer

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Volume 32, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22193

Keywords

breast cancer; long noncoding RNA; prognosis; Z38

Funding

  1. National Nature Science Foundation of China [81472027, 81501820]
  2. Jiangsu Provincial Health-Strengthening Engineering by Science and Education
  3. Nanjing Medical University Science and Technique Development Foundation [2014NJMU038, 2015NJMUZD049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundLong noncoding RNA (lncRNA) Z38 has been shown to promote cell proliferation and tumorigenesis in breast cancer. However, expression pattern and prognostic value of lncRNA Z38 in breast cancer patients remain elusive. MethodsThe expression levels of SPRY4-IT1 in 110 self-paired specimens of breast cancer and adjacent normal breast tissues were measured by quantitative real-time PCR (qRT-PCR), and its correlation with overall survival of patients with breast cancer was further statistically analyzed. ResultsCompared with normal breast tissues, Z38 was upregulated in breast cancer tissues. Furthermore, of 110 breast cancer patients, high Z38 expression was significantly associated with tumor-node-metastasis stage and lymph node metastasis. Further analysis using the Cox regression model revealed that Z38 expression was an independent prognostic factor of overall survival in patients with breast cancer (hazard ratio=4.74, 95% confidence interval 2.41-9.32). The nomogram presents a good prediction of the probability of overall survival of breast cancer patients (c-index: 0.792), and its predictive efficiency was further confirmed by the calibration curve. ConclusionOur data highlighted the potential of lncRNA Z38 as novel candidate biomarker to identify patients with breast cancer at high risk of tumor death.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available