4.5 Article

Reassessment of the Access Testosterone chemiluminescence assay and comparison with LC-MS method

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL LABORATORY ANALYSIS
Volume 32, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1002/jcla.22286

Keywords

cross-reaction; DxI platform; immunoassay method; liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry; LoQ; testosterone

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Aim of the studyTo reassess the imprecision and Limit of Quantitation, to evaluate the cross-reaction with dehydroepiandrosterone-sulfate (DHEAS), the accuracy toward liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry (LC-MS) and the reference interval of the Access Testosterone method, performed by DxI immunoassay platform (Beckman Coulter). Material and MethodsImprecision was evaluated testing six pool samples assayed in 20 different run using two reagents lots. The cross-reaction with DHEAS was studied both by a displacement curve and by spiking DHEAS standard in two serum samples with known amount of testosterone. The comparison with LC-MS was evaluated by Passing-Bablock analysis in 21 routine serum samples and 19 control samples from an External Quality Assurance (EQA) scheme. The reference interval was verified by an indirect estimation on 2445 male and 2838 female outpatients. ResultsThe imprecision study showed a coefficient of variation (CV) between 2.7% and 34.7% for serum pools from 16.3 and 0.27nmol/L. The value of Limit of Quantitation at 20% CV was 0.53nmol/L. The DHEAS showed a cross-reaction of 0.0074%. A comparison with LC-MS showed a trend toward a slight underestimation of immunoassay vs LC-MS (Passing-Bablock equations: DxI=-0.24+0.906 LCMS in serum samples and DxI=-0.299+0.981 LCMS in EQA samples). The verification of reference interval showed a 2.5th-97.5th percentile distribution of 6.6-24.3nmol/L for male over 14years and <0.5-2.78nmol/L for female subjects, in accord with the reference intervals reported by the manufacturer. ConclusionsThe Access Testosterone method could be considered an adequately reliable tool for the testosterone measurement.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available