4.8 Review

Nutrient-sensing nuclear receptors PPARα and FXR control liver energy balance

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL INVESTIGATION
Volume 127, Issue 4, Pages 1193-1201

Publisher

AMER SOC CLINICAL INVESTIGATION INC
DOI: 10.1172/JCI88893

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. NIDDK [U24 DK097748]
  2. Robert R.P. Doherty Jr. Welch Chair in Science grant [Q-0022]
  3. NIH [T32DK007664]
  4. US Public Health Service grant [P30DK56338]
  5. North American Society for Pediatric Gastroenterology, Hepatology and Nutrition Foundation/Nestle Nutrition Research Young Investigator Development Award

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The nuclear receptors PPAR alpha (encoded by NR1C1) and farnesoid X receptor (FXR, encoded by NR1H4) are activated in the liver in the fasted and fed state, respectively. PPAR alpha activation induces fatty acid oxidation, while FXR controls bile acid homeostasis, but both nuclear receptors also regulate numerous other metabolic pathways relevant to liver energy balance. Here we review evidence that they function coordinately to control key nutrient pathways, including fatty acid oxidation and gluconeogenesis in the fasted state and lipogenesis and glycolysis in the fed state. We have also recently reported that these receptors have mutually antagonistic impacts on autophagy, which is induced by PPAR alpha but suppressed by FXR. Secretion of multiple blood proteins is a major drain on liver energy and nutrient resources, and we present preliminary evidence that the liver secretome may be directly suppressed by PPAR alpha, but induced by FXR. Finally, previous studies demonstrated a striking deficiency in bile acid levels in malnourished mice that is consistent with results in malnourished children. We present evidence that hepatic targets of PPAR alpha and FXR are dysregulated in chronic undernutrition. We conclude that PPAR alpha and FXR function coordinately to integrate liver energy balance.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available