4.6 Article

Resource Depletion Perspective on the Link Between Abusive Supervision and Safety Behaviors

Journal

JOURNAL OF BUSINESS ETHICS
Volume 162, Issue 1, Pages 213-228

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10551-018-3983-2

Keywords

Abusive supervision; Attentional bias toward safety; Safety behavior; Self-control resource

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71501177, 71371179]
  2. National Key Research and Development Program of China [2016YFC0802600]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Leader behavior significantly influences employees' safety performance. This study aimed to examine the effect of abusive supervision on the safety behaviors of subordinates. By drawing on the strength model of self-control, we predicted that abusive supervision would negatively affect safety behaviors through emotional exhaustion, and trait self-control and attentional bias toward safety would moderate the relationship between abusive supervision, emotional exhaustion, and safety behaviors. Our hypothesized model was supported by results from a sample of 159 workers at a chemical product manufacturing enterprise in China. Emotional exhaustion mediated the link between abusive supervision and safety behaviors. Moreover, trait self-control moderated the relationship between abusive supervision and emotional exhaustion, and attentional bias toward safety moderated the relationship between emotional exhaustion and safety compliance. This study elucidates the effects of abusive supervision on safety behaviors through the resource depletion process. Likewise, the importance of trait self-control and attentional bias toward safety in mitigating the potentially harmful effects of abusive supervision in workplace safety is highlighted. Minimizing abusive supervision, providing self-control training, and implementing safety-specific implicit cognition intervention can effectively improve employees' safety behaviors.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available