4.5 Article

Constraining the accuracy of flux estimates using OTM 33A

Journal

ATMOSPHERIC MEASUREMENT TECHNIQUES
Volume 13, Issue 1, Pages 341-353

Publisher

COPERNICUS GESELLSCHAFT MBH
DOI: 10.5194/amt-13-341-2020

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Wyoming School of Energy Resources Center of Excellence in Air Quality
  2. Clean Air Task Force
  3. Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Other Test Method 33A (OTM 33A) is a nearsource flux measurement method developed by the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) primarily used to locate and estimate emission fluxes of methane from oil and gas (O&G) production facilities without requiring site access. A recent national estimate of methane emissions from O&G production included a large number of flux measurements of upstream O&G facilities made using OTM 33A and concluded the EPA National Emission Inventory underestimates this sector by a factor of similar to 2.1 (Alvarez et al., 2018). The study presented here investigates the accuracy of OTM 33A through a series of test releases performed at the Methane Emissions Technology Evaluation Center (METEC), a facility designed to allow quantified amounts of natural gas to be released from decommissioned O&G equipment to simulate emissions from real facilities (Fig. 1). This study includes test releases from single and multiple points, from equipment locations at different heights, and spanned methane release rates ranging from 0.16 to 2.15 kg h(-1). Approximately 95% of individual measurements (N = 45) fell within +/- 70% of the known release rate. A simple linear regression of OTM 33A versus known release rates at the METEC site gives an average slope of 0.96 with 95% CI (0.66, 1.28), suggesting that an ensemble of OTM 33A measurements may have a small but statistically insignificant low bias.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available