4.7 Article

Sex Difference in the Clinical Presentation of Primary Hyperparathyroidism: Influence of Menopausal Status

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLINICAL ENDOCRINOLOGY & METABOLISM
Volume 102, Issue 11, Pages 4148-4152

Publisher

ENDOCRINE SOC
DOI: 10.1210/jc.2017-01080

Keywords

-

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Context: Female-to-male ratio in primary hyperparathyroidism (PHPT) is 3:1, but data on sex impact on the clinical presentation are limited. Design: We evaluated, retrospectively, sex difference in biochemistry and clinical presentation at diagnosis in a monocentric series of 417 patients with PHPT: 93 men (58.6 +/- 14.5 years), and 324 women (61.7 +/- 12.8 years), of whom 54 were premenopausal (pre-F) and 270 postmenopausal (post-F). Results: Men were significantly younger (P = 0.046) and more frequently symptomatic than women (62.3% vs 47%, P = 0.016). No sex difference was found in serum parathyroid hormone, calcium, creatinine, 25-hydroxy-vitamin D, and urinary calcium levels, whereas serum phosphate was higher in women. Nephrolithiasis (detected by imaging or history of passing stones) was more frequent in men (50.5% vs 33% in women, P = 0.003) and osteoporosis (T-score <-2.5 at any site) was more frequent in women (52.2% vs 35.5% in men, P = 0.0066). Symptomatic patients were 43.3%, 64.8%, and 62.3% in post-F women, pre-F women, and men, respectively. Kidney stones were less frequent and osteoporosis more frequent in post-F women than in pre-F women (28.1% vs 59.2% and 58.9% vs 18.5%, respectively). After combining symptomatic and asymptomatic patients meeting surgical criteria recommended by current guidelines, no sex difference was observed in the proportion of patients to be referred for surgery (84.6% in men vs 84.9% in women). Conclusion: Biochemical activity of PHPT seems to be independent of sex, but clinical presentation is different, mostly due to menopausal state. However, surgical referral was indicated equally in men and women.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available