4.6 Review

Combining molecular and imaging metrics in cancer: radiogenomics

Journal

INSIGHTS INTO IMAGING
Volume 11, Issue 1, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1186/s13244-019-0795-6

Keywords

Radiomics; Radiogenomics; Molecular profiling; Precision medicine

Funding

  1. NIH/NCI Cancer Center Support Grant [P30 CA008748]
  2. Breast Cancer Research Foundation
  3. Susan G. Komen
  4. Spanish Foundation Alfonso Martin Escudero
  5. European School of Radiology
  6. Jubilaumsfonds of the Austrian National Bank
  7. 2020 Research and Innovation Framework Programme PHC-11-2015 [667211-2]
  8. H2020-FETOPEN-2018-2019-2020-01 [828978]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Background Radiogenomics is the extension of radiomics through the combination of genetic and radiomic data. Because genetic testing remains expensive, invasive, and time-consuming, and thus unavailable for all patients, radiogenomics may play an important role in providing accurate imaging surrogates which are correlated with genetic expression, thereby serving as a substitute for genetic testing. Main body In this article, we define the meaning of radiogenomics and the difference between radiomics and radiogenomics. We provide an up-to-date review of the radiomics and radiogenomics literature in oncology, focusing on breast, brain, gynecological, liver, kidney, prostate and lung malignancies. We also discuss the current challenges to radiogenomics analysis. Conclusion Radiomics and radiogenomics are promising to increase precision in diagnosis, assessment of prognosis, and prediction of treatment response, providing valuable information for patient care throughout the course of the disease, given that this information is easily obtainable with imaging. Larger prospective studies and standardization will be needed to define relevant imaging biomarkers before they can be implemented into the clinical workflow.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available