3.8 Article

Diabetic Vasculopathy: Macro and Microvascular Injury

Journal

CURRENT PATHOBIOLOGY REPORTS
Volume 8, Issue 1, Pages 1-14

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s40139-020-00205-x

Keywords

Diabetes; Atherosclerosis; Vascular injury; Macrovascular; Microvascular

Funding

  1. Collaborative Research Travel Grant (Burroughs Wellcome Fund)
  2. UNC Clinical and Translational Science AwardK12 Scholars Program [KL2TR002490]
  3. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute [K01HL145354]
  4. UNC-NORC Pilot & Feasibility Grant [P30DK056350]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Purpose of Review Diabetes is a common and prevalent medical condition as it affects many lives around the globe. Specifically, type-2 diabetes (T2D) is characterized by chronic systemic inflammation alongside hyperglycemia and insulin resistance in the body, which can result in atherosclerotic legion formation in the arteries and thus progression of related conditions called diabetic vasculopathies. T2D patients are especially at risk for vascular injury; adjunct in many of these patients, their cholesterol and triglyceride levels reach dangerously high levels and accumulate in the lumen of their vascular system. Recent Findings Microvascular and macrovascular vasculopathies as complications of diabetes can accentuate the onset of organ illnesses; thus, it is imperative that research efforts help identify more effective methods for prevention and diagnosis of early vascular injuries. Current research into vasculopathy identification/treatment will aid in the amelioration of diabetes-related symptoms and thus reduce the large number of deaths that this disease accounts annually. This review aims to showcase the evolution and effects of diabetic vasculopathy from development to clinical disease as macrovascular and microvascular complications with a concerted reference to sex-specific disease progression as well.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available