4.7 Article

Cooking fuel choice in rural China: results from microdata

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 538-547

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.05.031

Keywords

Cooking fuel; Solid fuel; Household; Energy poverty; Rural China

Funding

  1. Strategic Priority Research Program of the Chinese Academy of Sciences [XDA05150600]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [71322306, 71273027, 71521002]
  3. Program for New Century Excellent Talents in University of Ministry of Education of China [NCET-13-0040]
  4. Fok Ying Tung Education Foundation
  5. Program for Excellent Young Talents in Universities of Beijing [YETP1181]
  6. Beijing Institute of Technology
  7. Australian Research Council [DP120101088]
  8. University of Western Australia (Research Collaboration Award)
  9. China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Unclean cooking fuel is widely used in the developing world, and it is the main indication of energy poverty in rural China. In this paper, we investigate the situation, transition, and determination of fuel choice in China's rural household cooking. Using the large scale micro-survey data of China Health and Retirement Longitudinal Study (CHARLS), we find that there is a big gap in using commercial cooking fuels between rural and urban households: 60% of the rural households adopt traditional biomass resource as their main fuel for cooking in 2011, while this figure is less than 5% in the urban. We also identify a significant spatial divide in fuel choice: in southeastern coastal areas, about 40% of the rural households prefer solid fuels, while this figure jumps to over 80% in northeastern areas. The longitudinal data also reveal a significant transition from traditional to modern fuels from 2008 to 2012. Moreover, the distance to the most commonly used farmer's market, education background, coal price and female labor participation are all influential in determining the households' choices. (C) 2016 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available