4.7 Review

A huge number of artificial waste material can be supplementary cementitious material (SCM) for concrete production - a review part II

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 142, Issue -, Pages 4178-4194

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2015.12.115

Keywords

Artificial waste; Supplementary cementitious material (SCM); Concrete; Agricultural waste; Industrial waste

Funding

  1. IPPP [PG046-2014A]
  2. Bright Spark University of Malaya (SBSUM)
  3. Institute of Research and Monitoring (IPPP) [PG046-2014A]
  4. Bright Sparks Unit

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Concrete is heavily used as a construction material in modern society. With the growth in urbanization and industrialization, the demand for concrete is increasing day by-days. Therefore, raw materials and natural resources are required in large quantities for concrete production worldwide. At the same time, a considerable quantity of industrial waste, agricultural waste and other types of solid material disposal are posing serious environmental issues. To minimize and reduce the negative impact of the concrete industry through the explosive usage of raw materials, the use of artificial wastes as supplementary cementitious materials, the source of which are both reliable and suitable for alternative preventive solutions promotes the environmental sustainability of the industry. This paper reviews the possible use of industrial and agricultural wastes as a supplementary cementitious material in the production of concrete. It aims to exhibit the idea of utilizing these wastes by elaborating upon their engineering, physical and chemical properties. This provides a summary of the existing knowledge about the successful use of artificial wastes such' as fly ash, slag, silica fume, rice husk ash, palm oil fuel ash, sugar cane bagasse ash, wood waste ash, bamboo leaf ash, and corn cob ash in the concrete industry. (C) 2016 Published by Elsevier Ltd.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available