4.3 Article

The moderating role of intrinsic motivation in cloud computing adoption in online education in a developing country: a structural equation model

Journal

ASIA PACIFIC EDUCATION REVIEW
Volume 21, Issue 1, Pages 121-141

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s12564-019-09611-2

Keywords

Human-computer interaction; Cloud computing; Computing education; MOOCs

Funding

  1. China Scholarship Council (CSC) under the Chinese Government Scholarship program
  2. CSC [2015BSZZ06]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In the provision of massive open online courses (MOOCs), cloud computing services enable students to synchronize their study materials anywhere, anytime, and using any device, which can improve learning performance and strengthen the teacher-student relationship via knowledge sharing. This study builds on the technological-organizational-environmental (TOE) framework and aims to identify the influencing factors of cloud computing adoption in educational settings for the provision of MOOCs. Another aim is to determine how intrinsic motivation moderates individual intention. Therefore, our study conceptualized a model that is supported by an empirical analysis of 232 respondents and takes into account the technological, organizational, and environmental impacts on individual attitudes toward adopting cloud computing in education. We evaluate the study hypotheses using structural equation modeling. The results demonstrate significant relationships between the technological and organizational constructs and attitudes toward the use of cloud computing. Meanwhile, competitive pressure from the environment has not been identified in any relationship with individual attitudes in government universities. The results provide new directions for policymakers to consider in the implementation of CC systems for the provision of MOOCs in developing countries. We also discuss potential implications, contributions, and suggestions for future research.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available