4.7 Article

Degradation rate of soil function varies with trajectory of agricultural intensification

Journal

AGRICULTURE ECOSYSTEMS & ENVIRONMENT
Volume 202, Issue -, Pages 160-167

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.agee.2014.12.004

Keywords

Agricultural intensification; Intensification metrics; Ecosystem services; Soil carbon; Soil degradation

Funding

  1. Scottish Government

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Efforts to maintain or increase food production in developed agriculture would be compromised if current high-intensity production was degrading supporting ecosystem services, such as the ability of soil to function. The link between cropping intensity, defined by pesticide and fertiliser applications, and soil biophysical status was examined at 70 sites in a high-yielding region of the UK, in which cropping sequences covering a wide range of intensity had diverged from a common low-intensity origin in the 1970s. Two sequences of still low or moderate intensity based on spring cereals or a low frequency of winter cereals formed comparators for three high intensity sequences based on winter wheat and potato which together were associated with adverse effects of -30% on soil carbon content in the upper soil layer (P < 0.001), -11% on soil water holding capacity (P < 0.01) and +15% on soil bulk density (P <0.001). Negative effects were also found in some high intensity sequences on soil macroporosity and penetrometer resistance. Even in this high-yielding region, therefore, current forms of intensification are associated with adverse trends in soil condition that may be detrimental to future production. The effects of these trends in soil condition on agricultural output now need to be quantified, and the economic burden accounted for, if fields reduce their capacity to yield or need reparation to keep them productive. (C) 2014 Elsevier B.V. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available