4.7 Article

A forest-based bioeconomy for Germany? Strengths, weaknesses and policy options for lignocellulosic biorefineries

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 153, Issue 1, Pages 51-62

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.03.156

Keywords

Bioeconomy; Technological innovations; Lignocellulose; Biorefinery; Forest sector; Germany

Funding

  1. Ministry of Science, Research and the Arts of Baden-WUrttemberg as part of the BBW ForWerts Graduate Program [LGFG200057]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The ambition to develop a bioeconomy depends largely on the forest-based sector. For creating higher value chains, technological innovations are sought in the field of lignocellulosic biorefining. Although biorefinery concepts have been under development for decades now in Germany, many relevant technological developments are still confined to the laboratory and pilot scale. By taking on a technological innovation systems (TIS) approach, this article provides an empirical analysis of the development of lignocellulosic biorefineries in Germany, as well as prospects and implications for the forest and wood sector. Specific attention is accorded to actors' perceptions, in particular regarding the direction of innovation. To this end, we discuss the conditions under which actors from different sectors (forest and wood industry, chemical industry and energy sector) interact and play different roles in the emerging field. The analysis highlights a number of internal and external system weaknesses (e.g., fragmented policies, underdeveloped market formation, technological immaturity, incomplete actor networks etc.). However, we argue that the innovation system presents a series of strengths as well. Besides the clear need for policy integration and coordination, the analysis highlights some specific policy options that could support the development of lignocellulosic biorefineries in Germany. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available