3.8 Proceedings Paper

Stability analysis of heat transfer hybrid/water nanofluids

Journal

MATERIALS TODAY-PROCEEDINGS
Volume 21, Issue -, Pages 708-712

Publisher

ELSEVIER
DOI: 10.1016/j.matpr.2019.06.743

Keywords

Hybrid nano fluids; Stability; Weight concentration; Al2O3-Sio(2)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Now a days cooling system faces very big challenge in order to meet out the cooling demand due to advanced technology. At the same time, the traditional cooling or heat transfer fluids exhausted their cooling capacity. The new heat transfer fluids have been developed to overcome this hurdle. The new heat transfer fluids is called as nanofluids, nanofluid is the dispersion of nanoparticle into base fluid. The new generation of heat transfer fluids for various industrial applications like Chemical processing industries, Power stations, Nuclear reactors, Transportation industries, Electronic industries and (Heating, Ventilation and Air Conditioning) HVAC face challenge in meeting out the cooling demand for the past decades. Instability is a common problem associated with nanofluids, the recent progress on the study of nanofluids, such as, the evaluation methods for the stability of nanofluids. In this experimental investigation, stability of Al2O3-Sio(2)/water hybrid nanofluid, are studied. The Al2O3-Sio(2)/water based nanofluid at 0.2 wt%, 0.4 wt% and 0.6 wt% particle weight concentration have been prepared by using two step method. The prepared nanofluids were characterized by UV-Vis Spectrophotometer, Zeta potential analysis and Photograph capturing techniques for analyzing the stability of nanofluids. It is found that the 0.2 wt% nanofluid possesses very poor stability, 0.4 wt% has moderate stability and 0.6 wt% nanofluids has comparatively good stability even after one month duration in static condition by the three techniques for stability analysis. (C) 2019 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available