3.8 Article

Bottlenecks of hydropower development in Central Asia: Failure of aid coordination by development banks

Journal

HYDROLOGICAL RESEARCH LETTERS
Volume 14, Issue 1, Pages 29-33

Publisher

JSHWR, JAGH, JAHS, JSPH
DOI: 10.3178/hrl.14.29

Keywords

aid coordination; Central Asia; hydropower; Rogun Dam; Tajikistan; transboundary trade of electricity

Funding

  1. JSPS KAKENHI [JP17K18578]
  2. Sumitomo Foundation
  3. 21st Century Culture and Academic Foundation
  4. University of Tokyo (Graduate School of Frontier Science, Department of International Studies)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The Central Asian countries have abundant but unevenly distributed natural resources including water. The Central Asia Power System (CAPS) project initiated by the Asian Development Bank and the Central Asia-South Asia Electricity Transmission and Trade Project (CASA-1000) initiated by the World Bank are planned to catalyze trade of electricity in this region. However, the existing surplus of the hydropower generation capacity of Tajikistan in summer may only meet the anticipated power demand by one project. The CAPS project (to be completed in 2023) may monopolize the surplus in Tajikistan and the CASA-1000 project (to be completed later) may suffer from the shortage of electricity. It stems from the failure of aid coordination between the Asian Development Bank and the World Bank. This study reveals (a) how the assumptions made for the CAPS and CASA-1000 projects differ, and (b) possible causes of the failed aid coordination. It turned out that (a) the officer in a development bank who is in charge of project development has little motivation to submit his or her project to aid coordination, (b) only geographic demarcation between two projects was discussed and agreed upon in the aid coordination, and (c) no technical detail of these projects was discussed in the aid coordination.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

3.8
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available