4.7 Article

Cost-based modelling of optimal emission quota allocation

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 472-484

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.079

Keywords

Quota allocation; Carbon emissions; Marginal emission abatement cost; Environmental performance; Building construction

Funding

  1. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [2016M600772]
  2. Xiamen University-Newcastle University Joint Strategic Partnership Fund
  3. Grant for Collaborative Innovation Center for Energy Economics and Energy Policy [1260Z0210011]
  4. Xiamen University Flourish Plan Special Funding [1260-Y07200]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Given that a fixed national emission reduction target could be achieved by imposing emission quotas among multiple decision-making units under administration, a novel nonlinear programming approach is proposed in this paper to obtain an optimal emission quota allocation in a least-cost way. Marginal emission abatement cost curves are simulated based on the environmental performance and marginal emission abatement costs measured in a set of parametric directional output distance functions with multi-inputs and multi-outputs. Further, the proposed model is applied to empirically investigate the optimal carbon emission quota allocation for China's building construction industry among thirty-three provinces in three different regions. The results indicate that the relatively developed eastern region in China has higher marginal emission abatement cost and can be imposed with more emission quotas, while the central and western regions can undertake more emission reduction. Approximately 74 million RMB can be saved by implementing the optimal emission allocation (proposed in this paper) as compared to a uniform emission quota allocation. The findings are of great theoretical, methodological, and practical significance for policymakers and social science researchers in terms of climate change mitigation. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available