4.7 Article

A Metric for Light Field Reconstruction, Compression, and Display Quality Evaluation

Journal

IEEE TRANSACTIONS ON IMAGE PROCESSING
Volume 29, Issue -, Pages 3790-3804

Publisher

IEEE-INST ELECTRICAL ELECTRONICS ENGINEERS INC
DOI: 10.1109/TIP.2020.2966081

Keywords

Light field imaging; light field processing; quality assessment; quality metric; spatial quality; angular quality

Funding

  1. National Natural Science Foundation of China [61901260, 61831015, 61521062, 61527804]
  2. China Postdoctoral Science Foundation [BX20180197, 2019M651496]
  3. Macau Science and Technology Development Fund [FDCT/022/2017/A1, FDCT/077/2018/A2]
  4. Research Committee at the University of Macau [MYRG2016-00137-FST, MYRG2018-00029-FST]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Owning to the recorded light ray distributions, light field contains much richer information and provides possibilities of some enlightening applications, and it has becoming more and more popular. To facilitate the relevant applications, many light field processing techniques have been proposed recently. These operations also bring the loss of visual quality, and thus there is need of a light field quality metric to quantify the visual quality loss. To reduce the processing complexity and resource consumption, light fields are generally sparsely sampled, compressed, and finally reconstructed and displayed to the users. We consider the distortions introduced in this typical light field processing chain, and propose a full-reference light field quality metric. Specifically, we measure the light field quality from three aspects: global spatial quality based on view structure matching, local spatial quality based on near-edge mean square error, and angular quality based on multi-view quality analysis. These three aspects have captured the most common distortions introduced in light field processing, including global distortions like blur and blocking, local geometric distortions like ghosting and stretching, and angular distortions like flickering and sampling. Experimental results show that the proposed method can estimate light field quality accurately, and it outperforms the state-of-the-art quality metrics which may be effective for light field.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available