4.7 Article

New insights into the anodic oxidation and electrocoagulation using a self-gas stirred reactor: A comparative study for synthetic C.I Reactive Violet 2 wastewater

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 432-446

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.08.174

Keywords

Decolorization; Electrocoagulation; Electrochemical oxidation; Wastewater treatment; Hydroxyl radicals; COD reduction

Funding

  1. Alexandria University
  2. City of Scientific Research and Technological Applications (SRTA-City) in Egypt

Ask authors/readers for more resources

This work deals with the studying the role of oxidizing agents through the comparative behavior of two anodic oxidation and electrocoagulation processes as a technological alternative for the decolorization of C.I Reactive Violet 2 dye. A typical mono azo dye is tested by using a new fixed bed batch self-gas stirred electrochemical cell. The optimum condition is obtained as current density = 79 A/m(2), initial dye concentration = 100 mg/L, pH 7, and NaCI concentration = 2 g/L, for which the predicted color removal efficiencies are 94.71 and 99.8%, rate constants of 0.072 and 0.179 min(-1) with half life time 936 and 3.87 min and achieved in 60 and 45 min as a time of reaction for anodic oxidation and electrocoagulation, respectively. The most enormous technique is electrocoagulation, achieving an almost total decolorization faster than anodic oxidation. Although the mechanisms of two processes are various manners, the results show that the pseudo-first-order rate kinetic oxidation that is fitted the best correlation of the decolorization rate of the dye. The relationship between decolorization and chemical oxygen demands reduction is finally discussed. This work indicates that two processes generally utilized in chemical industry and are a promising alternative for the treatment of the textile wastewater containing reactive dyes. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available