4.7 Article

Life cycle environmental and economic assessment of a LID-BMP treatment train system: A case study in China

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 149, Issue -, Pages 227-237

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.02.086

Keywords

Stormwater; LID-BMP; Life-cycle assessment; Life-cycle costing; Environmental impact

Funding

  1. Programme of Introducing Talents of Discipline to Universities [B07002]
  2. Natural Science Foundation Project [51278267]
  3. National Water Pollution Control Special Project [2011ZX07301003]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A cost-combined life-cycle assessment was conducted to estimate the environmental and economic burdens of a low impact development best management practice (LID-BMP) treatment train system in China. Results showed that climate change, human toxicity, terrestrial ecotoxicity, freshwater ecotoxicity, marine ecotoxicity and fossil depletion dominantly contributed to the overall environmental effect. Infiltration pit exhibited the highest environmental effects because of high consumption of PVC and nonwoven fabrics, whereas grassed swale and buffer strip had the lowest environmental impacts. The operation phase showed great environmental benefits because a LID-BMP treatment train system can significantly reduce the emissions of heavy metals, suspended solids, total nitrogen, and total phosphorus to water. From an economic perspective, constructed wetland exhibited the highest economic burdens where the costs of graded gravel and bedding plants had a significant function, whereas grassed swale had the lowest economic burdens because of low consumption of raw materials. Optimizing the efficiency of PVC, non-woven fabric consumption, and road transport is an effective way to improve the potential environmental performance of LID-BMP construction phase. (C) 2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available