4.7 Article

Ecological vulnerability assessment based on PSSR in Yellow River Delta

Journal

JOURNAL OF CLEANER PRODUCTION
Volume 167, Issue -, Pages 1106-1111

Publisher

ELSEVIER SCI LTD
DOI: 10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.04.106

Keywords

Ecosystem; Vulnerability; Assessment; PSSR model; Wetland in the Yellow River Delta

Funding

  1. NSFC-Henan Provincial People's Government Joint Fund of Personnel Training [U1304511]
  2. Henan province science and technology research project [152102410052]
  3. Collaborative Innovation Center of Water Resources Efficient Utilization and Protection Engineering, Henan Province
  4. Program for Science & Technology Innovation Talents in Universities of Henan Province [15HASTIT049]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Ecological vulnerability assessment of wetlands is a very important early-stage task for wetland protection, pollution treatment, ecological restoration and water resources utilization. On the basis of the study of vulnerability evolution mechanism of wetland ecosystem in the Yellow River Delta, this paper proposes a Pressure-Support-State-Response Model (PSSR) for ecosystem vulnerability assessment and employs a single-factor evaluation method. The proposed model is applied to assessing ecosystem vulnerability of wetland in Yellow River Delta (a case study of Dongying City). Research results show that: from 2005 to 2009, the ecosystem vulnerability of wetlands in Yellow River Delta was 0.62, and 0.68 from 2010 to 2014; the ecosystem vulnerability grade is moderately vulnerable during the two periods. Generally speaking, regional ecosystem vulnerability slightly decreases. More efforts should be made to protect and restore the ecosystem and prevent it from deterioration and wetlands degradation. This study may provide a theoretical support for wetland protection, management, exploitation and policy making in the Yellow River Delta. (C)2017 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available