4.6 Article

HYBRID SWARA-COPRAS METHOD FOR RISK ASSESSMENT IN DEEP FOUNDATION EXCAVATION PROJECT: AN IRANIAN CASE STUDY

Journal

JOURNAL OF CIVIL ENGINEERING AND MANAGEMENT
Volume 23, Issue 4, Pages 524-532

Publisher

VILNIUS GEDIMINAS TECH UNIV
DOI: 10.3846/13923730.2017.1281842

Keywords

risk assessment; deep foundation; excavation project; COPRAS; SWARA; Shiraz

Funding

  1. PDRU (Malaysia) [PY/2016/07174]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Existing risks in deep foundation excavation projects is a major issue in developing cities. With the rapid increase in the number of various deep foundation and excavation projects in big cities of Iran, many accidents related to deep excavation have been reported every year. These accidents affected delay and increased cost of project implementation. Therefore identification and assessment of risks of these accidents is essential. The aim of the research was to develop a framework to overcome limitations of previous approaches to assess of risks in excavation projects. According to the complexity of a problem and the inherent uncertainty, the framework adopted SWARA (Step-wise Weight Assessment Ratio Analysis) and COPRAS (COmplex PRoportional ASsessment) methods through introducing new criteria for risk assessment. Data was collected through interview, a literature review and a questionnaire survey distributed to excavation project experts. A case study of deep foundation excavation in Shiraz was presented. The results have shown that the risks involving construction safety, unfavourable geological conditions, shortage of managerial experience, incomplete emergency plan and subsidence of ground are the most significant risks excavation projects in Shiraz. The proposed framework and the obtained results can help stakeholders of excavation projects in developing countries better to manage project risks.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available