4.5 Article

Peer victimization predicts heightened inflammatory reactivity to social stress in cognitively vulnerable adolescents

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHILD PSYCHOLOGY AND PSYCHIATRY
Volume 59, Issue 2, Pages 129-139

Publisher

WILEY
DOI: 10.1111/jcpp.12804

Keywords

Peer victimization; cytokines; social stress; hopelessness; adolescence

Funding

  1. Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research (NWO) [451-15-004]
  2. National Institute of Mental Health (NIMH) [K08 MH103443]
  3. Brain & Behavior Research Foundation [23958]
  4. Society in Science - Branco Weiss Fellowship
  5. NIMH [R01 MH085505]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

BackgroundDuring adolescence, peer victimization is a potent type of social stressor that can confer enduring risk for poor mental and physical health. Given recent research implicating inflammation in promoting a variety of serious mental and physical health problems, this study examined the role that peer victimization and cognitive vulnerability (i.e. negative cognitive styles and hopelessness) play in shaping adolescents' pro-inflammatory cytokine responses to an acute social stressor. MethodsAdolescent girls at risk for psychopathology (n=157; M-age=14.73years; SD=1.38) were exposed to a laboratory-based social stressor before and after which we assessed salivary levels of three key pro-inflammatory cytokines - interleukin-6 (IL-6), interleukin-1 (IL-1), and tumor necrosis factor- (TNF-). ResultsAs hypothesized, adolescents with greater peer victimization exposure exhibited greater increases in IL-6 and IL1- in response to the laboratory-based social stressor. Moreover, for all three cytokines individually, as well as for a combined latent factor of inflammation, peer victimization predicted enhanced inflammatory responding most strongly for adolescents with high levels of hopelessness. ConclusionsThe findings reveal a biological pathway by which peer victimization may interact with cognitive vulnerability to influence health in adolescence.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.5
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available