4.7 Article

Prediction of Bond Dissociation Energies/Heats of Formation for Diatomic Transition Metal Compounds: CCSD(T) Works

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 13, Issue 3, Pages 1057-1066

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.6b00971

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Chemical Sciences, Geosciences and Biosciences Division, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-FG02-03ER15481]
  2. U.S. Department of Energy Office of Science, Office of Basic Energy Sciences, Heavy Element Chemistry Program [DE-FG02-12ER16329]
  3. Robert Ramsay Chair Fund of The University of Alabama
  4. DOE's Office of Biological and Environmental Research

Ask authors/readers for more resources

It was recently reported (J. Chem. Theory Comput 2015, 11, 2036-2052) that the coupled cluster singles and doubles with perturbative triples method, CCSD(T), should not be used as a benchmark tool for the prediction of dissociation energies (heats of formation) for the first row transition metal diatomics based on a comparison with the experimental thermodynamic values for a set of 20 diatomics. In the present work the bond dissociation energies as well as the heats of formation for those diatomics have been calculated by the Feller Peterson Dixon approach at the CCSD(T)/ complete basis set (CBS) level of theory including scalar relativistic corrections and correlation of the outer shell of core electrons in addition to the valence electrons. Revised experimental values for the hydrides are presented that are based on new heterolytic R H bond dissociation energies, which are needed for analysis of the mass spectrometry experiments. The agreement between the calculated bond dissociation energies and the revised experimental values of the hydrides is good. Good agreement of the calculated bond dissociation energies/heats of formation is also found for most of the chlorides, oxides, and sulfides given the experimental error bars from experiment and those of the transition metal atoms in the gas phase. Thus, reliable results can be achieved by the CCSD(T) method at the CBS limit. The use of PW91 orbitals for the CCSD(T) calculations improves the predictions for some compounds with large T-1 diagnostics at the HF-CCSD(T) level. The optimized bond distances and calculated vibrational frequencies for the diatomics also agree well with the available experimental values.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available