4.7 Article

Efficient Construction of Free Energy Profiles of Breathing Metal-Organic Frameworks Using Advanced Molecular Dynamics Simulations

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL THEORY AND COMPUTATION
Volume 13, Issue 12, Pages 5861-5873

Publisher

AMER CHEMICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1021/acs.jctc.7b01014

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Fund for Scientific Research-Flanders (FWO)
  2. Research Board of Ghent University (BOF)
  3. BELSPO [IAP/7/05]
  4. European Union's Horizon research and innovation programme (consolidator ERC) [647755 DYNPOR (20152020)]
  5. Research Foundation-Flanders (FWO)
  6. Flemish Government-department EWI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In order to reliably predict and understand the breathing behavior of highly flexible metal organic frameworks from thermodynamic considerations, an accurate estimation of the free energy difference between their different metastable states is a prerequisite. Herein, a variety of free energy estimation methods are thoroughly tested for their ability to construct the free energy profile as a function of the unit cell volume of MIL-53(Al). The methods comprise free energy perturbation, thermodynamic integration, umbrella sampling, metadynamics, and variationally enhanced sampling. A series of molecular dynamics simulations have been performed in the frame of each of the five methods to describe structural transformations in flexible materials with the volume as the collective variable, which offers a unique construct an accurate free energy profile at different temperatures for MIL-53(Al) from first principles at the PBE+D3(BJ) level of theory. This study yields insight into the importance of the different aspects such as entropy contributions and anharmonic contributions on the resulting free energy profile. As such, this thorough study provides unparalleled insight in the thermodynamics of the large structural deformations of flexible materials.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available