4.7 Article

Net-like mesoporous carbon nanocomposites for magnetic solid-phase extraction of sulfonamides prior to their quantitation by UPLC-HRMS

Journal

MICROCHIMICA ACTA
Volume 187, Issue 2, Pages -

Publisher

SPRINGER WIEN
DOI: 10.1007/s00604-019-4072-7

Keywords

Carbon-based composite; Magnetic nanomaterials; Adsorbent; One-pot synthesis; Adsorption mechanism; pi interaction; Hydrogen bonds; Sample preparation; Milk analysis; Antibiotics

Funding

  1. Environmental Protection Department of Hubei Province [2017HB04]
  2. Fundamental Research Funds for the Central Universities, China University of Geosciences (Wuhan) [CUG170102]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

A net-like mesoporous carbon nanocomposite (MCN) was hydrothermally prepared by using filter paper as the raw material. The MCN contains magnetic nanoparticles of type Fe3O4 which result from the addition of Fe(NO3)(3)center dot 9H(2)O during synthesis. The MCN was characterized by X-ray diffraction, Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy, scanning electron microscopy, transmission electron microscopy, Raman spectra, Brunauer-Emmett-Teller methods and vibrating sample magnetometry. The MCN is shown to be a viable material for magnetic solid-phase extraction of trace sulfonamides (SAs) including sulfadiazine, sulfapyridine, sulfamerazine, sulfamethazine, sulfamethizole, sulfamethoxypridazine, sulfachloropyridazine and sulfadimethoxine. Following desorption with acetone containing 0.5% ammonia, the SAs were quantified by UPLC with high-resolution mass spectrometric detection. With sulfamethazine as an example, the adsorption equilibrium configurations and the major interaction mechanism between SAs and the MCN were calculated by using density functional theory. Under the optimal conditions, the calibration plots are linear in the 0.05-10 ng center dot mL(-1) SA concentration ranges. The limits of detection are between 7.2 and 13.6 ng center dot L-1. The recoveries from spiked samples ranged from 79 to 107%, with relative standard deviations of <9.9%.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available