4.7 Article

SparseMaps-A systematic infrastructure for reduced scaling electronic structure methods. V. Linear scaling explicitly correlated coupled-cluster method with pair natural orbitals

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 146, Issue 17, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4979993

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. U.S. National Science Foundation [CHE-1362655, ACI-1047696, ACI-1450262]
  2. Camille and Henry Dreyfus Foundation
  3. Max Planck Society
  4. DFG [SPP 1601]
  5. cluster of excellence (RESOLV, University of Bochum) [EXC 1069]
  6. Fonds der Chemischen Industrie
  7. DOE Office of Science User Facility [DE-AC02-06CH11357]
  8. Direct For Mathematical & Physical Scien
  9. Division Of Chemistry [1362655] Funding Source: National Science Foundation

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this work, we present a linear scaling formulation of the coupled-cluster singles and doubles with perturbative inclusion of triples (CCSD(T)) and explicitly correlated geminals. The linear scaling implementation of all post-mean-field steps utilizes the SparseMaps formalism [P. Pinski et al., J. Chem. Phys. 143, 034108 (2015)]. Even for conservative truncation levels, the method rapidly reaches near-linear complexity in realistic basis sets, e.g., an effective scaling exponent of 1.49 was obtained for n-alkanes with up to 200 carbon atoms in a def2-TZVP basis set. The robustness of the method is benchmarked against the massively parallel implementation of the conventional explicitly correlated coupled-cluster for a 20-water cluster; the total dissociation energy of the cluster (similar to 186 kcal/mol) is affected by the reduced scaling approximations by only similar to 0.4 kcal/mol. The reduced scaling explicitly correlated CCSD(T) method is used to examine the binding energies of several systems in the L7 benchmark data set of noncovalent interactions. Published by AIP Publishing.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available