4.4 Review

Modeling Biowaste Biorefineries: A Review

Journal

FRONTIERS IN SUSTAINABLE FOOD SYSTEMS
Volume 4, Issue -, Pages -

Publisher

FRONTIERS MEDIA SA
DOI: 10.3389/fsufs.2020.00011

Keywords

thermochemical conversion platform; biological conversion platform; hybrid conversion platform; network modeling; process modeling; optimization

Funding

  1. ERA-NET FACCE-SurPlus FLEXIBI Project
  2. VLAIO project [HBC.2017.0176]
  3. FWO-SB Grant [1SC0920N]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The biorefining of biowaste is an upcoming novel strategy, but is mostly still in its conceptual phase. Biowaste biorefineries would allow (rural) communities to convert their biowaste into value-added biofuels, biochemical compounds, and fertilizers. Several different types of biowaste biorefineries have already been developed, but little to none of these designs are already commercially exploited. Their further development and commercial implementation is hampered by the high investment costs and risks, little trusts in its novel technologies, expected yields and profits, and operating reliability. Modeling these integrated processes, together with their supply chains, would allow for optimizing the considered biorefinery designs and coincidently speeding up the R&D-process. The optimized biorefinery designs and supply chains would additionally embed an increased amount of trust in potential investors in terms of the economic sustainability of the considered novel processes. Therefore, in this publication, a summary of existing biorefinery models is presented, together with supply chain network models. The discussed biorefinery models are categorized according to the conversion platform they use, being thermochemical, biological, or hybrid ones. Furthermore, the overall inherent advantages and disadvantages of all conversion platforms are summarized and a scope of further research needs is presented.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.4
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available