4.7 Article

Visualising crystal packing interactions in solid-state NMR: Concepts and applications

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL PHYSICS
Volume 147, Issue 14, Pages -

Publisher

AMER INST PHYSICS
DOI: 10.1063/1.4996750

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Collaborative Computational Project for NMR Crystallography - EPSRC (UK) [EP/J010510/1, EP/M022501/1]
  2. European Union under a Marie Curie Initial Training Network FP7-PEOPLE-ITN [316630 CAS-IDP]
  3. EPSRC [EP/K013564/1]
  4. Engineering and Physical Sciences Research Council [EP/J010510/1, EP/P022480/1, EP/P022561/1, EP/K013564/1, EP/M022501/1] Funding Source: researchfish
  5. EPSRC [EP/M022501/1, EP/K013564/1, EP/J010510/1, EP/P022561/1, EP/P022480/1] Funding Source: UKRI

Ask authors/readers for more resources

In this article, we introduce and apply a methodology, based on density functional theory and the gauge-including projector augmented wave approach, to explore the effects of packing interactions on solid-state nuclear magnetic resonance (NMR) parameters. A visual map derived from a so-termed magnetic shielding contribution field can be made of the contributions to the magnetic shielding of a specific site-partitioning the chemical shift to specific interactions. The relation to the established approaches of examining the molecule to crystal change in the chemical shift and the nuclear independent chemical shift is established. The results are applied to a large sample of 71 molecular crystals and three further specific examples from supermolecular chemistry and pharmaceuticals. This approach extends the NMR crystallography toolkit and provides insight into the development of both cluster based approaches to the predictions of chemical shifts and for empirical predictions of chemical shifts in solids. (C) 2017 Author(s). All article content, except where otherwise noted, is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available