4.7 Article

Theory of elastic neutrino-electron scattering

Journal

PHYSICAL REVIEW D
Volume 101, Issue 3, Pages -

Publisher

AMER PHYSICAL SOC
DOI: 10.1103/PhysRevD.101.033006

Keywords

-

Funding

  1. Visiting Scholars Award Program of the Universities Research Association
  2. U.S. Department of Energy, Office of Science, Office of High Energy Physics [DE-SC0019095]
  3. Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft DFG through the Collaborative Research Center [The Low-Energy Frontier of the Standard Model] [SFB 1044]
  4. United States Department of Energy [DE-AC0207CH11359]
  5. Fermilab theory group
  6. U.S. Department of Energy (DOE) [DE-SC0019095] Funding Source: U.S. Department of Energy (DOE)

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Theoretical predictions for elastic neutrino-electron scattering have no hadronic or nuclear uncertainties at leading order making this process an important tool for normalizing neutrino flux. However, the process is subject to large radiative corrections that differ according to experimental conditions. In this paper, we collect new and existing results for total and differential cross sections accompanied by radiation of one photon, nu e -> nu e(gamma). We perform calculations within the Fermi effective theory and provide analytic expressions for the electron energy spectrum and for the total electromagnetic energy spectrum as well as for double- and triple-differential cross sections with respect to electron energy, electron angle, photon energy, and photon angle. We discuss illustrative applications to accelerator-based neutrino experiments and provide the most precise up-to-date values of neutrino-electron scattering cross sections. We present an analysis of theoretical error, which is dominated by the similar to 0.2%-0.4% uncertainty of the hadronic correction. We also discuss how searches for new physics can be affected by radiative corrections.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.7
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available