4.3 Article

RNAi-Induced Electrophysiological and Behavioral Changes Reveal Two Pheromone Binding Proteins of Helicoverpa armigera Involved in the Perception of the Main Sex Pheromone Component Z11-16:Ald

Journal

JOURNAL OF CHEMICAL ECOLOGY
Volume 43, Issue 2, Pages 207-214

Publisher

SPRINGER
DOI: 10.1007/s10886-016-0816-6

Keywords

Helicoverpa armigera; Pheromone binding proteins; RNA interference; Sex pheromone detection

Funding

  1. Chinese National Basic Research Program [2012CB114104]
  2. National Natural Science Foundation of China [31272048, 31471778, 31672038, 31621064]
  3. Beijing Nova Program [Z1511000003150118]

Ask authors/readers for more resources

Pheromone binding proteins (PBPs) are thought to play key roles in insect sex pheromone recognition; however, there is little in vivo evidence to support this viewpoint in comparison to abundant biochemical data in vitro. In the present study, two noctuid PBP genes HarmPBP1 and HarmPBP2 of the serious agricultural pest, Helicoverpa armigera were selected to be knocked down by RNA interference, and then the changes in electrophysiological and behavioral responses of male mutants to their major sex pheromone component (Z)-11-hexadecenal (Z11-16:Ald) were recorded. There were no significant electrophysiological or behavioral changes of tested male moths in response to Z11-16: Ald when either single PBP gene was knocked down. However, decreased sensitivity of male moths in response to Z11-16: Ald was observed when both HarmPBP1 and HarmPBP2 genes were silenced. These results reveal that both HarmPBP1 and HarmPBP2 are required for the recognition of the main sex pheromone component Z11-16: Ald in H. armigera. Furthermore, these findings may help clarify physiological roles of moth PBPs in the sex pheromone recognition pathway, which in turn could facilitate pest control by exploring sex pheromone blocking agents.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.3
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available