4.6 Article

Visualization of vascular mural cells in developing brain using genetically labeled transgenic reporter mice

Journal

JOURNAL OF CEREBRAL BLOOD FLOW AND METABOLISM
Volume 38, Issue 3, Pages 456-468

Publisher

SAGE PUBLICATIONS INC
DOI: 10.1177/0271678X17697720

Keywords

CNS vasculature development; mural cells; pericytes; platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta; transgenic reporter mice

Funding

  1. European Research Council [AdG 294556 BBBARRIER]
  2. Swedish Research Council
  3. Swedish Cancer Foundation
  4. Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation
  5. Leducq Foundation transatlantic network grant Sphingonet
  6. Uppsala University

Ask authors/readers for more resources

The establishment of a fully functional blood vascular system requires elaborate angiogenic and vascular maturation events in order to fulfill organ-specific anatomical and physiological needs. Although vascular mural cells, i.e. pericytes and vascular smooth muscle cells, are known to play fundamental roles during these processes, their characteristics during vascular development remain incompletely understood. In this report, we utilized transgenic reporter mice in which mural cells are genetically labeled to examine developing vascular mural cells in the central nervous system (CNS). We found platelet-derived growth factor receptor beta gene (Pdgfrb)-driven EGFP reporter expression as a suitable marker for vascular mural cells at the earliest stages of mouse brain vascularization. Furthermore, the combination of Pdgfrb and NG2 gene (Cspg4) driven reporter expression increased the specificity of brain vascular mural cell labeling at later stages. The expression of other known pericyte markers revealed time-,region-and marker-specific patterns, suggesting heterogeneity in mural cell maturation. We conclude that transgenic reporter mice provide an important tool to explore the development of CNS pericytes in health and disease.

Authors

I am an author on this paper
Click your name to claim this paper and add it to your profile.

Reviews

Primary Rating

4.6
Not enough ratings

Secondary Ratings

Novelty
-
Significance
-
Scientific rigor
-
Rate this paper

Recommended

No Data Available
No Data Available